To receive full 10 marks allocated for participation, earn at least 15 participation points.
There are ~25 available points to choose from:
-
Good peer ratings - Criteria for professional conduct (1 point for each criterion, max 7)
- Competency criteria (2 points for each, max 6)
Only those who submit peer evaluations can earn participation points from peer evaluations they receive.
- In-lecture quizzes (1 each, max 10 points)
- Module admin tasks done on time and as instructed
- Peer evaluations (1 points each)
- Pre-module survey (1 points)
If your response in the pre-module survey is not usable, you will not earn points for this exercise.
Relevant: [
Peer evaluation criteria: professional conduct
- Professional Communication :
- Communicates sufficiently and professionally. e.g. Does not use offensive language or excessive slang in project communications.
- Responds to communication from team members in a timely manner (e.g. within 24 hours).
- Punctuality: Does not cause others to waste time or slow down project progress by frequent tardiness.
- Dependability: Promises what can be done, and delivers what was promised.
- Effort: Puts in sufficient effort to, and tries their best to keep up with the module/project pace. Seeks help from others when necessary.
- Quality: Does not deliver work products that seem to be below the student's competence level i.e. tries their best to make the work product as high quality as possible within her competency level.
- Meticulousness:
- Rarely overlooks submission requirements.
- Rarely misses compulsory module activities such as pre-module survey.
- Teamwork: How willing are you to act as part of a team, contribute to team-level tasks, adhere to team decisions, etc.
Peer evaluation criteria: competency
- Technical Competency: Able to gain competency in all the required tools and techniques.
- Mentoring skills: Helps others when possible. Able to mentor others well.
- Communication skills: Able to communicate (written and spoken) well. Takes initiative in discussions.